X an algebraic K3 surface; its Picard lattice:
Pic(X)=NS(X)≃Zρ,ρ(X):=rkPic(X)
NS(X)≃Pic(X)≃Z⟨algebraic curves in X⟩/⟨linear equivalences⟩⊂H2(X,Z)
Pic(X) with the intersection pairing (D,D′)↦D⋅D′.
Over Q, viewing X also as a complex manifold,
Pic(XQ)≃H1,1(XC)∩H2(XC,Z)⊂H2(XC,Z)≃(−E8)2⊕U3≃Z22
H2(XC,Q)≃Pic(XQ)Q⊕T(X)Q
Goal
From the equations of X, compute Pic(X)⊂H2(X,Z) as a Gal(k/k)-module.
"The evaluation of ρ for a given surface presents in general grave difficulties." (Zariski)
H1(Gal(k/k),PicX)X(k)≃Br1(X)/Br0(X)⊂X(Ak)Br⊂X(Ak)
P2(T)=det(T−Frob∣H2); roots αi, ∣αi∣=q.
q−22P2(qT) monic; roots ζi:=αi/q, ∣ζi∣=1.
Tate classes correspond to roots of unity (Tate, a theorem for K3 surfaces over finite fields).
q−22P2(qT)=h(T)i∏Φki(T)γiΦk the k-th cyclotomic polynomial;h has no cyclotomic factorρ(XFqr)=ki∣r∑γidegΦki
Example: X:=Z(y4−x3z+yz3+zw3+w4)⊂P3, p=89.
p−22P2(pT)=(T−1)(T+1)(T−1)4(T4+1)h(T),degh=12
For p>7, naive point counting is impractical; crystalline methods [Abbott--Kedlaya--Roe, C, C--Harvey--Kedlaya, Tuitman--Pancratz].
Let X/Fq, where q=pn, be an abelian surface or a K3 surface. Then:
Take f∈Z[x,y,z,w] and X:=Z(f)⊂PQ3.
We may consider the surface Xp:=Z(fmodp)⊂P3(Fp).
If X and Xp are smooth then the specialization map is injective
Pic(XQal)↪Pic(Xp)andρ(XQal)≤ρ(Xp).
Goal
For a given f and p, improve the inequality ρ(XQal)≤ρ(Xp).
Parity reasons might already force the inequality to not be sharp.
Endomorphisms of the transcendental lattice can complicate things even further.
Pic for a K3 surface plays a similar role as End(A) for an abelian variety A.
NS(A)Q≃{ϕ∈End(A)Q:ϕ†=ϕ},† the Rosati involution
| non-CM | CM |
|---|---|
| EndQEal=Q | EndQEal=Q(−d) |
ap≡0modp⟺p inert or ramified in Q(−d)⟺EndQEal≃EndQEpal
| p | 11.a2: EndQEpal | 27.a2: EndQEpal |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | B2,∞, a2=−2, supersingular | B2,∞, 2≡2mod3 |
| 3 | Q(−11) | bad reduction |
| 13 | Q(−1) | Q(−3), 13≡1mod3 |
| ⇒ | EndQEal=Q | EndQEal=Q(−3) |