Picard lattice, over finite fields

P2(T)=det(TFrobH2)P_2(T) = \det(T - \operatorname{Frob} \mid H^2); roots αi\alpha_i, αi=q|\alpha_i| = q.
q22P2(qT)q^{-22}P_2(qT) monic; roots ζi:=αi/q\zeta_i := \alpha_i/q, ζi=1|\zeta_i| = 1.

Tate classes correspond to roots of unity (Tate, a theorem for K3 surfaces over finite fields).

q22P2(qT)=h(T)iΦki(T)γiΦk the k-th cyclotomic polynomial;h has no cyclotomic factorρ(XFqr)=kirγidegΦki\begin{gathered} q^{-22}P_2(qT) = h(T)\prod_i\Phi_{k_i}(T)^{\gamma_i} \\ \Phi_k\text{ the }k\text{-th cyclotomic polynomial};\quad h\text{ has no cyclotomic factor} \\ \rho(X_{\Bbb{F}_{q^r}}) = \sum_{k_i\mid r}\gamma_i\deg\Phi_{k_i} \end{gathered}

Example: X:=Z(y4x3z+yz3+zw3+w4)P3X := Z(y^4 - x^3z + yz^3 + zw^3 + w^4) \subset \mathbf{P}^3, p=89p = 89.

p22P2(pT)=(T1)(T+1)(T1)4(T4+1)h(T),degh=12p^{-22}P_2(pT) = (T-1)(T+1)(T-1)^4(T^4+1)h(T), \qquad \deg h = 12

  • (T1)=Φ1(T-1) = \Phi_1, degree 11;
  • (T+1)=Φ2(T+1) = \Phi_2, degree 11;
  • (T1)4=Φ14(T-1)^4 = \Phi_1^4, degree 44;
  • (T4+1)=Φ8(T^4+1) = \Phi_8, degree 44.
  • Over F89\Bbb{F}_{89}: only k=1k=1 divides r=1r=1, so ρ(XF89)=1+4=5\rho(X_{\Bbb{F}_{89}}) = 1+4 = 5.
  • Over F89r\Bbb{F}_{89^r}: Φ2\Phi_2 joins when 2r2\mid r, Φ8\Phi_8 when 8r8\mid r; ρ(X89)=1+1+4+4=10\rho(\overline{X}_{89}) = 1+1+4+4 = 10, reached at r=8r=8.
  • Pic(X89)\operatorname{Pic}(\overline{X}_{89}) decomposes as Pζ1Pζ2Pζ8P_{\zeta_1}\oplus P_{\zeta_2}\oplus P_{\zeta_8}.

For p>7p > 7, naive point counting is impractical; crystalline methods [Abbott--Kedlaya--Roe, C, C--Harvey--Kedlaya, Tuitman--Pancratz].

5
Picard lattice, over finite fields P 2 ( T ) = det ⁡ ( T − Frob ⁡ ∣ H 2 ) ; roots α i , ∣ α i ∣ = q . q − 22 P 2 ( q T ) monic; roots ζ i : = α i / q , ∣ ζ i ∣ = 1 . Tate classes correspond to roots of unity (Tate, a theorem for K3 surfaces over finite fields). q − 22 P 2 ( q T ) = h ( T ) ∏ i Φ k i ( T ) γ i Φ k the k -th cyclotomic polynomial ; h has no cyclotomic factor ρ ( X F q r ) = ∑ k i ∣ r γ i deg ⁡ Φ k i Example: X : = Z ( y 4 − x 3 z + y z 3 + z w 3 + w 4 ) ⊂ P 3 , p = 89 . p − 22 P 2 ( p T ) = ( T − 1 ) ( T + 1 ) ( T − 1 ) 4 ( T 4 + 1 ) h ( T ) , deg ⁡ h = 12 ( T − 1 ) = Φ 1 , degree 1 ; ( T + 1 ) = Φ 2 , degree 1 ; ( T − 1 ) 4 = Φ 1 4 , degree 4 ; ( T 4 + 1 ) = Φ 8 , degree 4 . Over F 89 : only k = 1 divides r = 1 , so ρ ( X F 89 ) = 1 + 4 = 5 . Over F 8 9 r : Φ 2 joins when 2 ∣ r , Φ 8 when 8 ∣ r ; ρ ( X ‾ 89 ) = 1 + 1 + 4 + 4 = 10 , reached at r = 8 . Pic ⁡ ( X ‾ 89 ) decomposes as P ζ 1 ⊕ P ζ 2 ⊕ P ζ 8 . For p > 7 , naive point counting is impractical; crystalline methods [Abbott--Kedlaya--Roe, C, C--Harvey--Kedlaya, Tuitman--Pancratz].