$$\operatorname{Pic}(A)/\operatorname{Pic}^0(A) = \operatorname{NS}(A)$$
$$\bigl(\operatorname{Pic}(A)/\operatorname{Pic}^0(A)\bigr)_{\Bbb{Q}} \simeq \{\phi \in \operatorname{End}(A)_{\Bbb{Q}} : \phi^{\dagger} = \phi\}, \qquad \dagger\text{ the Rosati involution}$$
APPROVED (2026-09-14): [s08-m01] Pic(A)/Pic^0(A) = NS(A); state the Rosati-fixed display for (Pic(A)/Pic^0(A))_Q. This is the sole visible NS gloss in the three lectures. Author: "yes, for Abelian varieties we can also have Pic(A)/Pic^0(A) = NS(A), just to help the reader"
APPLIED, SOURCE-SETTLED (2026-09-14): [s08-m02] Applied the quotient definition of rho(A), including after base change. Checked Milne, Abelian Varieties, Section 17 and Proposition 17.2; V:L590. The approved NS gloss is unchanged.
APPLIED, SOURCE-SETTLED (2026-09-14): [s08-m03] Applied geometric base change to the new Kummer bridge. The sixteen exceptional curves are geometric; this is not an arithmetic rank identity. Checked I15:L512-518; the source uses algebraic closures.
NEEDS APPROVAL (2026-09-14): [s08-m04] Recommendation: Prepend "Fix a polarization on A" to the Rosati display. The omitted polarization is inherited from V:L366-369 and L:L452-455; retain that display pending the author. Checked Milne, Section 17, Proposition 17.2, which fixes a polarization and works over an algebraically closed field. The notes already supply the polarization; current slide 19 does so visibly.
AUTHOR'S CALL: [s08-m90] Keep the opening Pic/End analogy, the later comparison of the two computation tasks, or both? Both formulations are preserved pending your choice.