Improving upper bounds: two specializations

$$\operatorname{Pic}(X^{\mathrm{al}}) \hookrightarrow \operatorname{Pic}(X_p^{\mathrm{al}}) \quad \text{and} \quad \rho(X^{\mathrm{al}}) \leq \rho(X_p^{\mathrm{al}})$$

Kloosterman—van Luijk

If $p$ and $q$ are two primes of good reduction, and

$$\begin{gathered} \rho(X_p^{\mathrm{al}}) = \rho(X_q^{\mathrm{al}}) = 2r, \\ \operatorname{disc} \operatorname{Pic}(X_p^{\mathrm{al}}) \neq \operatorname{disc} \operatorname{Pic}(X_q^{\mathrm{al}}) \quad \text{in } \Bbb{Q}^{\times}/(\Bbb{Q}^{\times})^2. \end{gathered}$$

then

$$\rho(X^{\mathrm{al}}) < 2r.$$

van Luijk (2005): first explicit K3 surfaces $X/\Bbb{Q}$ with $\rho(X^{\mathrm{al}})=1$.

Does this always work?